Cookie Preferences
By clicking, you agree to store cookies on your device to enhance navigation, analyze usage, and support marketing.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
You'll get our top undervalued gold stock picks along with macro-investor news.
BONUS: We'll also add you to our sponsor's list (Great Pacific Gold Corp)
You can unsubscribe at anytime
We use cookies to provide you with the best possible experience. They also allow us to analyze user behavior in order to constantly improve the website for you.
We use cookies to provide you with the best possible experience. They also allow us to analyze user behavior in order to constantly improve the website for you.
By clicking, you agree to store cookies on your device to enhance navigation, analyze usage, and support marketing.
We use third-party cookies that help us analyze how you use this website, store your preferences, and provide the content and advertisements that are relevant to you. We do not sell your information. However, you can opt out of these cookies by checking Do Not Share My Personal Information and clicking the Save My Preferences button. Once you opt out, you can opt in again at any time by unchecking Do Not Share My Personal Information and clicking the Save My Preferences button
On Wednesday morning, the US Treasury stepped in to stop government borrowing costs from rising any further. Gold jumped $188 in a single day. Three of the most-followed voices in the gold world reached the same conclusion within hours of each other — and it wasn't the one the government intended.
What to watch next →For most of August, gold sat quietly around $4,300–$4,400. It had fallen a long way from its record of $5,602 back in January, and most people had stopped paying attention.[7]
Then, at 8:30 on Wednesday morning, the US Treasury made an announcement almost nobody expected. It said it would at least double the amount of long-term government bonds it buys back — from $2 billion per operation to at least $4 billion — starting September 9.[1]
The reaction was immediate:
Two other things landed the same day, and together they tell the story. The Treasury confirmed that America's national debt had passed $40 trillion for the first time.[3] And that afternoon, notes from the Federal Reserve's July meeting showed several officials arguing that interest rates should go up, not down.[8]
So in one day the market was told three contradictory things: the debt is growing faster than expected, the central bank is thinking about tightening, and the government is buying bonds anyway. Stocks tried to rally and gave it back. Gold didn't.
A government "bond buyback" means the Treasury buying back its own IOUs from investors. It does that when nobody else wants to buy them at a price it likes. It's the financial equivalent of a company propping up its own share price — and the market read it exactly that way.
Most coverage of this story is written for bond traders. Here's the translation.
That's it. Everything else below is in ordinary language.
Live gold chart. Source: TradingView. Switch to the 6-month view to see the January peak, the long slide, and this week's move back above $4,500.
Three numbers put the current price in context:
That combination is unusual and important. Gold is in a powerful long-term uptrend, but it is not at a record. Anyone buying today is buying something that has already corrected hard once this year — which is why the three analysts below spend more time on risk management than on price targets.
Live precious metals charts. Source: TradingView.
Silver is the wild one. It is up around 100% so far this year, and still sits roughly 44% below the high it reached in late January near $121.[10] When silver leads gold higher — as it did this week — precious-metals investors usually take it as a sign the move has genuine momentum behind it rather than being a one-day scare.
One simple gauge: it took 67.6 ounces of silver to buy an ounce of gold on Tuesday. By Thursday it took about 66.4. Silver is catching up.
Platinum, meanwhile, quietly broke out too. Tavi Costa admits he owns very little of it and probably should own more — noting that platinum tends to move violently once it starts moving.
Live US dollar index. Source: TradingView. Switch to the 12-month view to see how close it is sitting to its long-term support level.
The dollar fell about 0.8% on the announcement, to 98.83. That sounds small. But it puts the dollar right on top of a support line that has held since 2011, and Costa's view is that it breaks — gradually, not dramatically. If he's right, that single trend has knock-on effects everywhere: gold up, oil up, imported goods more expensive, and money rotating out of expensive US assets into cheaper markets elsewhere.
Live 30-year US government bond yield. Source: TradingView.
Here is the detail that convinced all three analysts the intervention had failed before it began.
When the Treasury made its announcement, the 30-year rate fell 9 basis points and the 10-year fell 6.[4] That's a real move. But by Thursday, the market had taken almost all of it back. One day of relief, then straight back up.
On Thursday, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent went on television and said the operations could be even bigger than $4 billion, and that his department intends to "make a market" in long-term bonds.[5] That is the sound of someone raising a bet, not collecting winnings.
Why does $4 billion barely register? Because the US government is currently borrowing roughly $2 trillion a year, and it already owes $40 trillion. Four billion dollars against those numbers is a bucket of water against a house fire. The announcement worked as a signal, not as a purchase. And the signal it sent was: we are worried.
These are not people who agree by default. Brien Lundin edits a newsletter focused on small exploration companies. Tavi Costa is a macro strategist who spends as much time on Brazilian banks and soybeans as on bullion. Peter Schiff has been warning about the dollar for twenty-five years. Reading the same Wednesday, they landed in the same place.
His read: the Treasury meant to look like it was in control. Stocks believed it for a few hours. Then investors thought it through and saw desperation instead.
His base case for the rest of the summer is a normal seasonal recovery — roughly 15% in gold from the lows, roughly 30% in mining shares — with anything beyond that a bonus.
His read: the dangerous combination is borrowing costs being held down at the same time as inflation is picking back up. Either alone is manageable. Together they are rocket fuel for metals.
He acted on it — but by buying emerging markets, not more gold, and by trimming a little into the strength.
His read: the Treasury is buying back cheap long-term debt and paying for it by issuing expensive short-term debt. That's like paying off a 3.5% mortgage with a one-year adjustable loan.
It buys a few weeks of calm and costs years of flexibility — and it corners the Fed into printing money later.
None of us owns enough gold.Tavi Costa, August 19 — said half-jokingly, with a serious undertone
Stripped of the professional vocabulary, here is where they overlap.
| The claim | Lundin | Costa | Schiff |
|---|---|---|---|
| The buyback is a sign of weakness, not strength. A government that has to bid for its own IOUs is telling you nobody else wants them. | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| The Treasury now matters more than the Fed. The central bank talks about tightening; the Treasury is loosening. Guess which one moves markets. | Yes | Implied | Yes |
| The pressure comes out of the dollar. If rates can't be allowed to rise, the currency takes the strain instead. | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Inflation is coming back, not going away. Energy into food, weaker dollar into import prices, deficits into everything. | Implied | Yes | Yes |
| Rising borrowing costs are good for gold, not bad. The old "why hold gold when bonds pay 5%?" argument breaks down when the 5% is a distress signal. | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| This is the start, not the finish. All three describe Wednesday as an opening move. | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Buy aggressively right here. The one they split on. | Partly | No — trimming | Yes |
For most of this year, the standard explanation for gold's slump was simple: why hold a metal that pays you nothing when a government bond pays 5%?
All three now reject that. Their logic: if borrowing costs are rising because investors are worried about debt and inflation, then bond prices are falling. Anyone holding those bonds is losing money. The rational response is to sell the bonds — and gold is where that money goes. Wednesday proved the point in reverse: rates fell and gold rose anyway, because the reason rates fell was government intervention.
The most striking exhibit in any of the three reports comes from Costa, and it answers the question everyone asks: isn't gold expensive at $4,500?
America's debt compared to the size of its economy is now roughly where it stood during World War II — slightly worse, in fact. But back then, nearly half of all government IOUs were covered by the gold sitting in the vaults. Today that figure is about 3%.
Share of US government debt covered by US gold holdings. Reproduced in description from "The Gold Is Gone," Tavi Costa, August 19, 2026.[12] Nobody is forecasting $75,000 gold. The point is the direction of travel: gold has risen more than thirtyfold since 1980, and the coverage ratio still fell from 18% to 3% — because the debt grew faster than the gold price did.
Gold isn't cheap or expensive on its own. It's cheap or expensive compared to something. Compared to its own history, $4,500 looks high. Compared to the pile of debt it's traditionally measured against, it looks like it hasn't kept up at all. That gap is the entire bull case.
Live gold-miner ETF charts. Source: TradingView.
Mining companies are leveraged to the gold price for a simple reason. It costs a miner roughly the same amount to dig an ounce out of the ground whether gold sells for $3,000 or $4,500. When the price rises, almost all of the increase drops straight to profit. That's why a 4% day in gold produced a 9–10% day in mining shares.
Costa's structural point is about the gap inside the sector. Big producing miners are currently priced as if gold were around $3,000–$3,500 an ounce. The small exploration companies that find the deposits are priced as if gold were $1,500. He expected the big miners to start buying the small ones to replace what they're mining — and instead sees almost no takeovers and shrinking exploration budgets, which he calls remarkable given where the gold price is.
Lundin's answer to the same observation is to own the explorers directly. His current published list, and what moved this month:
| Company | Price | Where | What happened |
|---|---|---|---|
| Group Eleven ResourcesZNG.V | C$0.81 | Ireland | Hit 3.6 m of 345 g/t silver and 0.75% copper, including a slice running 2,120 g/t silver. Extended the copper-silver zone another 710 m. His only "strong buy." |
| Arras MineralsARK.V | C$1.42 | Kazakhstan | 568.9 m of copper-gold mineralisation in one hole. 2026 drilling doubled to 40,000 m across a 10 km trend. |
| K2 GoldKTO.V | C$0.88 | California | 39.6 m at 5.35 g/t gold, including 12.2 m at 13.52 g/t. All three holes so far have hit. |
| Onyx GoldONYX.V | C$1.64 | Ontario | 67 m at 1.7 g/t with a metre of visible gold at 73.4 g/t. Roughly 1.4 km of strike, still open. |
| Astra ExplorationASTR.V | C$0.485 | Argentina | 2 m at 80.54 g/t gold. Eight holes still waiting on lab results; next drill phase in October. |
| Mackay Gold & SilverMACK.V | C$3.04 | Nevada | Second rig added. Chasing an 1870s tunnel intersection that has never been drilled with modern equipment. Funded by a US$60m raise in April. |
| Torr MetalsTMET.V | C$0.16 | British Columbia | Encouraging visual signs of copper in the core — but the lab results aren't back yet, which is an important distinction. |
These are Lundin's published opinions, not recommendations from this recap. Exploration companies are the riskiest way to express a view on gold: most never find an economic deposit, they routinely need to raise more money at lower prices, and they can fall 50% on bad drill results regardless of what gold is doing. Visual observations of rock are not the same as assay results. Position size matters more here than in any other part of the market.
If you only read the gold sections of these reports, you'd miss the connection between them.
Costa opens his report not with gold but with farm commodities. Agricultural prices have quietly reached their highest level in a decade, and the broader index is pressing against a downtrend that has capped it for thirty years. His chain of reasoning is short: higher energy prices eventually become higher food prices, and the ongoing Iran conflict — now in its sixth month — is keeping energy elevated.
Schiff gets to the same place differently. His argument is that wars don't cause inflation; the way you pay for wars causes inflation. Nobody raised taxes or cut other spending. The bill went on the national credit card, which is now at $40 trillion with interest costs above $1 trillion a year — the government's second-biggest expense after Social Security.[11]
The day after the Treasury announcement, while everyone watched bonds and bullion: corn rose 10%, wheat 3.9% and soybeans 3.2%. Brent crude held above $88. That isn't a metals story. It's the same story with a different label.
All three arguments boil down to one sentence: the people in charge have chosen inflation, because the alternative — letting the market charge an honest price to lend $40 trillion — is politically impossible. Gold is simply the most direct way to bet on that choice.
The useful thing about this particular story is that it comes with a calendar. Most big-picture theories take years to prove or disprove. This one has checkpoints.
| Date | What happens | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| Sept 9 | First enlarged buyback | Does the Treasury show up at $4 billion, or bigger? And does it actually push borrowing costs down, or do they keep climbing? |
| Mid-Sept | Federal Reserve meeting | Markets currently see roughly a one-in-three chance of a rate rise. Schiff's central bet is that it never comes. |
| Nov 4 | Next quarterly funding plan | The number to watch isn't the buyback size — it's how much of the government's borrowing is short-term. That's the risk Schiff describes. |
| Ongoing | Dollar index near 98 | Costa's highest-conviction call. A clear break below would validate the whole rotation trade. |
| Ongoing | Silver around $68 | He called the silver breakout early and corrected himself publicly. A clean weekly close above resistance is the confirmation the sector wants. |
| Ongoing | Takeovers of small miners | Costa's missing catalyst. If big miners start buying explorers, the valuation gap closes quickly. |
None of these three is a neutral observer, and the bearish case deserves stating plainly.
Gold is still almost 20% below its January high. Silver is 44% below its. Both are recovering from a genuine speculative blow-off that hurt everyone who bought the top seven months ago — and blow-offs often take years, not months, to be fully repaired. A Federal Reserve that actually raises rates, a ceasefire in Iran that pulls energy prices down, or a credible plan to reduce the deficit would undermine every one of the points above at the same time.
It's also worth noticing that Costa — the only one of the three who manages outside money in these markets — is the most cautious of them. He expects the short-term traders betting against this move to get a few good days. He trimmed some silver exposure into the strength. And he says openly that he redeployed too early earlier this year and it cost him.
That's the most transferable idea in any of these reports: decide what you'll do at higher prices and lower prices before the market forces the decision on you.
The US government stepped in to cap its own borrowing costs, the market erased the move within a day, and gold closed above $4,500 for the first time since June. Three analysts who agree on almost nothing agreed on what that means.
This is a summary of three published commentaries dated August 19–20, 2026, checked against news coverage and primary documents where possible. Price levels come from those sources and from live market data; quotes vary slightly between data feeds and between spot and futures prices. Treat the levels as accurate to within a few dollars.
Nothing here is investment advice, and the author is not a licensed financial adviser. This is a summary of other people's published opinions, not a recommendation to buy or sell anything. Always do your own research and speak to a licensed professional before making investment decisions.
This recap is editorial. No company named in it has paid for its inclusion, and Gold Market Recap received no compensation for publishing it. All three analysts summarised here, however, have commercial interests in the topics they cover. Brien Lundin's publisher discloses that it and its affiliates trade in the securities discussed in its newsletter. Tavi Costa manages money in the sectors he writes about and discloses positions in mining companies, agricultural commodities and emerging-market equities. Peter Schiff sells precious metals and operates a brokerage. Read all three with that in mind — as they themselves would tell you to.
Investing in precious metals and mining shares carries substantial risk, including the possible loss of your entire investment. Gold and silver prices can and do fall sharply. Small exploration companies are volatile by nature and can lose most of their value regardless of what the gold price is doing. Past performance tells you nothing about future results.
Live charts provided by TradingView. Compiled August 20, 2026.